N.Wells
Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ May 24 2016,22:54) | N.Wells my challenges were based upon the press release from the University of Toronto, not the Blencowe paper.
It's sad that the best you can do is misrepresent what was being discussed. |
That last sentence is an outright lie. The first sentence is lame and pitiful, even for you.
You are being a total idiot. Your claim is about the science. This is presented in the paper, which is described (albeit not well) in the press release. You have a habit of picking on stuff that you find attractive without properly understanding it, and then misrepresenting it. You also have a bad habit of not going further than abstracts and press releases. This kills your arguments more often than not, as happened here. Go on, go post that argument in Larry's thread and see how far that gets you.
Science trumps individual papers, papers trump abstracts, and abstracts trump press releases, and pretty much everything confuses you. Deal with it.
I'm representing everything just fine. You misrepresented the press release, which in turn misrepresented the paper, leaving you completely full of BS, as usual.
If you simply assumed that as a rule whatever you were going to say is wrong, and that not saying anything was the wisest course of action, you would be far ahead of where you are today.
Don't you care about making yourself a laughingstock? Wouldn't you rather actually make statements that are correct and which don't leave you looking like a fool?
|
