RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (622) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: A Separate Thread for Gary Gaulin, As big as the poop that does not look< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
GaryGaulin



Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: May 01 2016,14:28   

Quote (N.Wells @ May 01 2016,11:42)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ May 01 2016,11:17)
And by the way it was in Microsoft's financial interest to cause Visual Basic programs to self-destruct in at least Windows 10. I cannot even open the forms of the ID Labs to work on them, compile or run from Visual Studio. I have to start all over again, from scratch, with a new computer language.

Have you tried stuff like
http://nuke.vbcorner.net/Article....lt.aspx
http://www.fortypoundhead.com/showcon....d=23993

I already found the same links you did. The problem is that it's already properly installed and was working well enough with Windows 10 to still use. The problem now is that newer versions of Windows no longer have all the files needed for the programs to properly run for others, and one of the more recent updates caused it to no longer run or compile on my end either. I was able to get the ID Lab #5 running for Camp who reported a problem I was able to fix by reducing the amount of time the program can stay running before the time step counter goes back to zero, but I am certain that Microsoft will soon do something else to disable it. Reinstalling VB6 all over again would at best fix a few of the tiny holes in a ship that was purposely blown to bits and sinking anyway. The best thing to do is for me to abandon ship, right now, then never ever go back to a Microsoft product.

Since one of the first languages I became proficient at is Assembler I'm thinking of switching to MASM32, even though it is not a cross platform language like C++ or Java and requires users to understand the inner workings of a PC.

Quote (N.Wells @ May 01 2016,11:42)
Quote
And of course it is in the financial interests of academics who only know how to rant about mutation and selection to trash my cognitive science related work. All that we were led to believe about their being there to help with new ideas was total bullshit. The truth is that those who are receiving incredible amounts of money to give the public a show-and-tell of what they learned in school/college get to call all the shots, aimed at my head.

Wrong, no one has an obligation to help you, or a financial interest in crushing you.  If you think you have something worthwhile, you can present it, and it is up to you to provide reasons for people to get interested.   That's the same for any scientist: each of us proposes stuff, and then other scientists figure out whether you have anything that is worth their time and attention.  Our advice is that your stuff is worthless and you'd be far better off concentrating on something less hopeless and useless and wrong that could help support your family.  That's excellent and financially valuable advice, and you are getting it for free.

In the previous pages I have been posting the latest papers that prove I am way ahead in the "basic science" that is going to force even the "deep learning" methodology that's now all the rage in academia back to the drawing board, unless of course it's only used for consumer products like self-driving cars where biological type intelligence would not work because of it getting bored by doing the same thing all day and become dangerous when abused because it will fight back and likely win.

In regards to the development of biological species ("evolution") the evidence shows that I was right, while you and others have been playing with your Darwinian toys that could not predict regulated circuits the model I have been developing requires.

A person has to have been born yesterday to believe that someone like me would be treated fairly by a system that normally only rewards the academic money pits. That is not to say all academic programs are a money pit, just the ones I'm up against that proved to want nothing at all to do with truly biologically relevant models like mine.

--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

   
  18634 replies since Oct. 31 2012,02:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (622) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]