N.Wells
Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 23 2016,21:38) | | Quote (N.Wells @ April 23 2016,21:31) | There's nothing in the longer post that's an explicit prediction, nor do you have any implicit predictions that follow logically from your model. What do you see as your predictions?
| Quote | | Please spare me the endless semantics. A "THEORY of operation" is still "THEORY". |
Clearly, a village idiot is still an idiot, but surprisingly for you, theories of operation and scientific theories are different. |
You are clearly better in philosophy than you are in science. But if you have a problem with the way it's worded then show me how you would edit the text to make the predictions "explicit" predictions. |
That's your job.
Also, I've already offered you suggestions on earlier versions, which you resolutely ignore, so no, do it yourself. I will note that the language is less of a problem than your pervasive crappy thinking, which seems unfixable. Best advice is toss it, give up, and go do something different that benefits you and your family.
Also, FWIW, I'm better in science than philosophy of science: it's just that you are absolutely terrible in both.
|
