N.Wells
Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote | | Then how would you (without changing the circuit requirement based format that is already there) prevent someone such as yourself from misinterpreting the operational definition. You need a body to control with "ears" on it to even "hear" a symphony, so requirement 1 is not an inherent problem. |
You don't have an operational definition. What you have is a very poorly written theory of operation for your model. That's not a theory and not an operational definition.
Beethoven was able to create wonderful music without functional ears. From https://www.quora.com/How-was....hearing
| Quote | | When you compose, you learn to hear (or think) the music in your head. The more you compose on paper, then actually hear it performed, the better this "in your head" music become. Beethoven was a master. He understood exactly what something would sound like just by the notes on the page. Mozart could do this as well. Most of his manuscripts were single edits, meaning he didn't go back and revise. This suggests what he wrote he liked, even after he heard it performed. |
See also http://news.discovery.com/history....222.htm
| Quote | | Although you'd think they'd be interested in eliminating loonies from serving... |
Perhaps they heard he was in the jury pool, and both sides quickly settled?
|
