NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Aug. 29 2015,16:40) | | Quote (NoName @ Aug. 29 2015,11:44) |
"Previously" controversial?
Are you now become the arbiter of controversy, having declared this one closed? |
40 years later the flame inside that lights our way still broadcasts brightly into the sky. Intensity only increased by adding digital audio and video broadcasts to our spectrum, for other worlds to more clearly hear and see us. The time it will take to reach them helps make sure their part of the universe has developed electronic technology required to see us from wherever they are in outer space, as we (including from science who from behind the scenes influence human culture) shine by:
Ellie Goulding - Burn
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v....d0aKWZE
The Discovery Institute dreamed of through science changing culture. And for hoopla sake it's best that I do not declare their controversy closed. The best is yet to come. At the moment all depends on where science goes in regards to operationally defining "reciprocal causation" for biology. The only theory premised for where that leads just happens to be ID theory the DI worded. I'm just a catalyst for what already exists, where the controversy ends on its own after arriving at scientific theory Sal for-real thrives in too. ID is in harmony with the developing message from human intelligent cause still being added the radio wave features of the universe and of living things to come to see and be influenced by. This is all beyond what the DI first imagined possible, but where it's even better than they thought then so be it. |
Gibbering insanity, every phrase.
It is beyond irrelevant what you declare closed or open.
ID is a shadow of a ghost of a failed delusion.
That you cling to it so tightly is merely another symptom of your madness.
Ask the DI if they're satisfied with what they've achieved. Were you to somehow winkle truth out of those wrinkled liars, you would see the twisted pain of their failures. You wouldn't recognize it, lest you recognize your own, but that's your problem.
|
