NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Aug. 25 2015,03:08) | I have it!
Google Scholar will show that "Molecular Species" and "Genomic Species" are existing phrases for what's shown. It's so logically connected that following a given path provides the words and order needed to form a coherent sentence best explaining that order of events. Connecting the generations through "Speciation" makes it very specific for over long periods of time, which in turn makes "Evo" words unnecessary.
... |
Oh goody, a new diagram.
This one is even more flawed than your previous cow-flop.
Molecules do not speciate. Regardless of the existence of the phrase "Molecular Species", which has already been explained to you.
There is no justification for labeling the line connecting molecule in row 2 to molecule in row 3 'Intelligent Cause'. It is your most blatant attempt yet to smuggle your conclusion into your "theory", with no explanation, no justification, no logical coherence, and, as per your usual standard, absolutely no evidence.
The same, of course, applies to the connection from row 3 to row 4.
To claim that a diagram that includes the words 'Species', 'Genome', 'Genomic', 'Unicellular', and 'Multicellular' makes "Evo" words unnecessary is simply insane.
As already noted, your diagram is as useful as simply taking a 'connect the dots' book and drawing random circles all over it.
Useless.
Epic fail, yet again.
If your work weren't so meaningless, it would be irrelevant.
What you have are fulminating delusions of comprehension.
|
