N.Wells
Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote (stevestory @ Aug. 01 2015,16:46) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ Aug. 01 2015,17:11) | | The theory already accounts for all evidence I know of that exists in all of science. |
wow. |
To be fair, he did qualify that as "all the evidence that he knows of". We have learned that that is a remarkably low bar.
Gary, much of your not-a-theory does not even make enough sense to be matched up against actual relevant scientific evidence. One might as well try to prove or disprove that the borogoves were in fact all mimsy. As for the rest of it, your not-a-theory fails scientifically because you can't demonstrate most of your key claims, such as molecular intelligence, and because undoubted examples of intelligence, such as Beethoven dreaming up a symphony or Stephen Hawking thinking up an equation, do not fall within your definition (so to speak, such as it is) of intelligence, while Neato vacuums do. For those reasons (and many, many more), your not-a-theory is worthless.
|
