NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ July 28 2015,07:29) | | And I said too bad for you because with the two papers in the Notes folder included with the IDLab5-Preliminary.zip file considered it's now the most supported computer model of its kind in all of science. It's even getting the right ratio of concordant signaling pairs in the internal representation of the external world, the navigation network. |
That's not nearly as special as you think it is.
Glen Davidson put it best:
| Quote (Glen Davidson @ July 25 2015,21:11) | It's pathetic not to have any meaningful results, isn't it?
…
You're just modeling a model which in turn models nothing.
Glen Davidson |
You have no meaningful results because you are modeling a model that is at best fantasy entirely of your own construction.
You continue to exhibit the error of assuming that because you can mimic an observed behavior [leaving aside the painful fact that you have neither], therefore you have elucidated how the behavior is in actual fact caused.
That we can use calculus to model the ideal trajectory of an osprey to catch a fish does not mean that the osprey uses calculus.
|
