ChemiCat
Posts: 532
Joined: Nov. 2013
|
| Quote | | The real definition/premise...... |
That should be "The real-definition" to go with your "real-science".
Let's recap;
1) "Molecular level intelligence" - no evidence presented, a bald statement with no data to support it nor any experimental results listed.
2) " Cellular level intelligence" - again as above. A bald statement without any data to support the assertion.
3) "The real-definition/real-premise of The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." - So vague as to be meaningless, which features? Who/what is the "intelligent cause"? This is just an attempt to force a supernatural explanation into the equation.
Gaulin, you have been given the methodology of scientific investigation on numerous occasions and nothing in your "real-science theory" follows that methodology. Excuse the shouting but..YOU ARE NOT DOING SCIENCE. You are paddling in the mud of ID, a religious concept to avoid calling it creationism. All of your unsupported claims point to this conclusion.
Unless and until you can provide data and experiments to test your theory (no, your "bug" doesn't do that), make it falsifiable and remove all the assertions you are just another of the godbots trying to sound sciency without even the basic understanding of science. You have wasted many years of your life on a pile of rubbish.
|
