k.e..
Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007
|
| Quote (Texas Teach @ May 29 2015,05:32) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ May 28 2015,20:21) | | Quote (N.Wells @ May 27 2015,19:36) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ May 27 2015,15:26) | | Quote (N.Wells @ May 27 2015,06:52) | | No. A working model can provide a useful test of whether we understand something (but not in your case, as every useful model requires ruthless and detailed ground-truthing), and it may provide additional understanding. However, a model that isn't carefully ground-truthed is pretty much mental masturbation. |
You do not even have a model for intelligence, hypocrite. |
I am not the person claiming to have modelled intelligence, therefore I am not a hypocrite. You are claiming to have a model, but you refuse to support it, ground-truth it, provide operational definitions, etc., etc., etc. This makes you not only a hypocrite but also a fool. |
If that's your opinion then I'm wasting my time with another jerk-off.
And by the way asshole, stop misusing the phrase "ground-truthed". |
The one thing you can get near unanimous agreement on is that you are wasting your time. We've literally been telling you this for years. |
Gary only does literal. He cant think literally.
--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin
|
