N.Wells
Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ May 28 2015,20:21) | | Quote (N.Wells @ May 27 2015,19:36) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ May 27 2015,15:26) | | Quote (N.Wells @ May 27 2015,06:52) | | No. A working model can provide a useful test of whether we understand something (but not in your case, as every useful model requires ruthless and detailed ground-truthing), and it may provide additional understanding. However, a model that isn't carefully ground-truthed is pretty much mental masturbation. |
You do not even have a model for intelligence, hypocrite. |
I am not the person claiming to have modelled intelligence, therefore I am not a hypocrite. You are claiming to have a model, but you refuse to support it, ground-truth it, provide operational definitions, etc., etc., etc. This makes you not only a hypocrite but also a fool. |
If that's your opinion then I'm wasting my time with another jerk-off.
And by the way asshole, stop misusing the phrase "ground-truthed". |
Oooh, that sure told me off.
However, you clearly don't know the meaning of ground-truthing, and you certainly don't practice it, even though it is absolutely essential in quality modelling.
Moreover, the demonstrable fact that you are being foolish is precisely why you have been wasting your time for years now.
|
