NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
Gary, the problem is the same as it ever was: you have no explanation nor any coherent conception of what counts as 'intelligent'.
Your "theory", despite its gloriously vague 'premise', fails to deliver what's on the label. We are all agreed that there are certain features of the universe best explained by intelligent cause(s).
We have identified several. To the surprise of no one at all, not even you, your "theory" is not only entirely impotent to explain anything about these 'features' but is required to discard them from the pool of features best explained by intelligent causation.
Your "theory" is entirely incapable of explaining, of accounting for, any aspect at all of:
crafting a theory
crafting the plot of a novel
crafting the characters and main situations that support and express the plot of a novel
compose a symphony
craft a melody
recognize a known melody even when played at a different tempo on a different instrument in a different key
recognize the style of a known artist when encountering a previously unknown work by that same artist
etc.
Your "theory" is not merely impotent, it is irrelevant.
It is also fundamentally flawed beyond the point that would render it merely incorrect.
Are we going to have to order you a tombstone engraved simply "Not even wrong"?
|
