RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (622) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: A Separate Thread for Gary Gaulin, As big as the poop that does not look< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
N.Wells



Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: April 26 2015,12:16   

Pitiful and contemptible, even for you.

     
Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 26 2015,11:39)
These people are scientifically lazy political hacks, not scientists.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......eration

A "theory of operation" is not a scientific theory.

Einstein's Theory of Operation of Relativity?????
Newton's Theory of Operation of Gravity????
Darwin's Theory of Operation of Evolution????

And since when do theories of operation require testing and development by an external community of experts?   "We are a large computer company and we have just developed the world's first supercomputer.  We are now asking for assistance in developing a theory of operations so that we can write a manual indicating which button to push." ??????

You remember the complaint (perhaps from NoName) about you jumping between different uses of words in order to smuggle in your desired conclusions? - this is a classic example, and it shows why you will probably never present your arguments honestly enough for them to be science.

  
  18634 replies since Oct. 31 2012,02:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (622) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]