GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
| Quote (N.Wells @ April 20 2015,13:31) | | Quote | | Demonstrating something Neuroscience may in the future explain happening in our brain's navigation system is icing on the cake. |
This is exactly why k.e. mentioned witches' brooms vs aeroplanes. Without good ground-truthing and modelling from fundamental principles, whether it is actually correct or not, the postulated cause of flight might as well be angel wings or jet-power witch flatulence.
Also, even if you do end up producing a decent model of navigation using place and grid cells, that won't say anything about speciation, emergence of intelligence, cellular intelligence, or how place and grid cells came about in the first place, or any of your other unsupported assertions. Nor does it address the problem that (according to your own criteria) your nonsense has been made obsolete by Edgar Postrado's more recent, somewhat more published, and vastly more comprehensive nonsense. |
You don't even study what the "fundamental principles" are. Or have a model of your own that is at least useful to AI.
Grandstanding about "ground-truthing" is just more of the usual changing of the subject away from models already doing a fine job of explaining the fundamental principles of intelligence modeling, at all levels of biology.
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
