Wesley R. Elsberry
Posts: 4991
Joined: May 2002
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Mar. 09 2015,18:47) | | I do not have to model neural networks like everyone else does for a model of brain to end up way more biologically representative of the way the real thing works than what Wesley believes is unbeatable. |
I wasn't confining Gary to what other people have done. If he has an implementation of a known model, that would be easier to check, but certainly if Gary has a one-off model and can specify what lines in GridCellNetwork.frm the implementation is at, I can assess the biological plausibility of the model from that information.
But I doubt that there is any such information. There wasn't for Trehub neural models, nor for "NEURONS" like Lehman and Stanley used, nor for various other claims Gary has made.
Gary doesn't have to have a neuron model from someone else, but to claim that his code has "neurons" or "NEURONS" of any sort, there has to be *some* neural model. I've looked. I haven't seen any such thing there. I've coded plenty of different artificial neural network models from scratch. But maybe Gary has a different artificial neural model implementation in there that has eluded my notice, in which case he can provide the line numbers to focus my attention at the appropriate point in the code.
Or he can continue to ignore substantive discussion and spew invective.
--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker
|
