Wesley R. Elsberry
Posts: 4991
Joined: May 2002
|
Gary has explicitly disclaimed any need for biological plausibility before, so the notion that he has anything "biologically accurate" is ever so much more laughable thereby. Hoot! (Remember the "neurons"? I do.)
I never said Gary's code already has introspection already built in. It really does pay to be able to distinguish English verb tenses.
That reading comprehension thing, Gary doesn't have much of that. What he has in plenty is projection about "semantics".
The funny thing is that if Gary had coded Heiserman's "gamma" class of robot, he could claim to have something that Heiserman would have said could make educated guesses *and* arguably have a form of introspection.
Gary also projects a bunch concerning his utter failure to answer RBynum's plain request. Gary's failure on that score is certainly not my fault; he had already "accomplished" that well before I entered the thread.
--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker
|
