NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 23 2015,17:48) | Only nutcases would expect the religious activists at UD to appreciate something that's "only science".
And likewise only nutcases would expect the religious activists in this forum to appreciate something that's "only science".
Science like this is hard work that requires years of study and experimenting. Throwing political slogans and insults requires no hard work at all, which is the way politicians like it. Therefore in a controversy like this the money and glory is in having no science at all. |
You're not doing science. You never were.
You are more clueless about what 'doing science' entails than anyone I have ever encountered. And I'm pretty sure that opinion is shared not just here, but at every site you've infested.
What makes you think your work is science? What evidence could you offer up to support the assertion that your work is science?
You've never addressed this, just like all your other avoidances.
Hint: your feelings, your personal delusions, nor the chorus of voices in your head are not evidence, least of all that you are 'doing science'.
Do I need to offer up, yet again, the evidence within your "theory" that proves it's not science? You know I can.
|
