GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
| Quote (socle @ Jan. 20 2015,22:16) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ Jan. 20 2015,21:46) | On publishing (in the ID science journal):
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-543162
I was under the impression that all were welcomed to contribute. But after considering doing so (again) I found out I was wrong. |
Well there's always, uhm, regular science journals. PLOS ONE seems to welcome 'citizen science'. |
Thanks for the advice socle. Due to the politics of the situation I first had to give the leadership of the ID movement and their existing resources all the benefit of doubt possible. But it looks like I'm only weeks away from rightfully and understandably having to completely give up on them.
It is not in my best interest (or science) to divide the movement. It would be better to work with it, towards something real. But unfortunately the only thing I ended up demonstrating so far is that the leadership of the ID movement seriously is too busy promoting religion to even care about their own theory.
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
