NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
Funny.
We're still waiting for evidence in support of the "theory".
There isn't any, there hasn't been any, and you are running away from that topic as fast as your pudgy little legs will carry you.
As for evidence against your "theory" -- we've provided mountains. Most especially, every single item that counts as intelligence and does not involve motor control or sensory input is evidence against your "theory".
Then there is your abuse of 'learn' and its variants. There are no standard definitions of 'learn' that support your nonsense. The canonical definition from Cognitive Science is entirely contrary to your usage.
And so it goes.
|
