NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (didymos @ Aug. 10 2014,07:42) | | Electronics terminology is entirely inappropriate for discussing intelligence, given that the vast majority of examples are biological (and the non-biological ones are modeled on biology and/or highly debatable). |
One glaring example of this is Gary's failure to account for the basic distinction between analog and digital.
RAM is clocked -- addresses are set at clock cycle points and read likewise. RAM usage is strictly quantized by a system clock.
There is zero evidence of such a quantized function or set of functions in biology.
Even if Gary tries to resurrect his notion of 'analog RAM', i.e., the sample-and-hold circuit, he does not avoid the need to address clocking. S-H circuits are clocked -- that's what the 'sample' part is all about.
Between clocking and the multiple interconnected feedback loops he's ignoring, we have to score this yet another epic unwin for Gary.
Hardly a surprise. If he were intelligent, or 'intelligent', he'd once in a while come up with a new 'guess' and his behavior would change.
But his own 'theory' shows that Gary lacks 'intelligence'.
|
