GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
| Quote (Woodbine @ July 29 2014,08:39) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ July 29 2014,10:57) | | For the past several days I was doing all I could to remain pragmatic while teaching the theory from the NCSE blog.... |
Why don't you teach your 'theory' from your own blog or forum? Then you won't have to deal with pointed criticism trolls or not having access to an edit button.
What is your motive in repeatedly depositing yourself onto other peoples' websites? |
This forum loudly calls for me to "Bring" the wretched Theory of Intelligent Design that I bear to where I'm supposed to bring it on:
So here I am.
The NCSE is also hopeful ID advocates bring their arguments to their blog. I had to get there eventually. They needed to know what they are scientifically up against in the ID issue, because of the premise for the controversial theory stating something that ultimately can be put into scientific context. Science itself is then against them as they fight scientific progress, for religious reasons. It's so easy to unknowingly become the enemy that they warned against, they needed to know before self-destructing by following the crowd that has been helping to lead them out of bounds of science. At the moment I'm waiting for Robert to explain how "Matter is information."
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
