NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ July 21 2014,21:30) | The theory I write is a privilege reserved for working systems that are ready for use. That is being denied by goalposts constantly being moved to theory where there is no working system ready for use, and by changing the subject to strawman arguments that ignore the fact that a model that proved it works already exist.
Not being able to follow standard practice is a symptom of science being sabotaged by religious politics, that stem from the theory in question being for a computer model of a system able to demonstrate how the phenomenon of "intelligent cause" works. |
Your "theory" only works because it smuggles in the concepts it pretends to explain as part of the alleged explanation.
That's a self-referential fail. Circularity explains nothing.
You have never provided a single actual explanation using your "theory". The reasons are obvious -- you and your 'theory' both lack explanatory power.
|
