NoName
Posts: 2729 Joined: Mar. 2013
|
Quote (GaryGaulin @ July 11 2014,09:39) | For additional epigenetic related information see "Should Evolutionary Theory Evolve?"
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articl....Evolve-
Darwinian theory was unable to predict this sensory guided (not random) behavior.
Theory that did correctly predict this, does not have that weakness. |
Insofar as you've said anything correct in this post, the only reasonable response is "yeah, so?".
You do not have a "theory". Your effluent does not make predictions, other than one you are entirely uncomfortable with and unable to counter.
What you really ought to be working on, rather than scurrying through actual scientific work you remain utterly clueless about, is addressing some of the issues raised against your nonsense. Like the two fatal flaws that make your idiocy circular and thus non-explanatory. "Intelligent because intelligent" answers nothing, predicts nothing, explains nothing, but seems to keep you as fascinated as a thumb in the field of view of someone on acid.
|