GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
| Quote (midwifetoad @ Dec. 28 2012,18:49) | Would it be talking trash to sak for a specific example where your theory departs from evolution or from other theories of learning?
For example, could you analyze the Lenski experiment in light of your theory? Could you suggest an extension of the Lenski experiment that would predict results that differentiate your theory from evolution? |
That is an excellent scientific question. I earlier addressed the E. coli long-term evolution experiment but that adds to the discussion.
The biggest difference between paradigms is expecting to see the complete molecular circuit (including any conjugative learning) for the self-learning system that is successfully finding new designs.
E.coli changing over time is simply a big yawn. You're here required to show how it works using the method shown in the text of the theory. Starts off with an overview of the intelligence level (here molecular and/or cellular) followed by how the complete system meets each of the four requirements for a self-learning (intelligent) system. It is a plus to have an Intelligence Design Lab to programmatically demonstrate what happened, but would still be science-worthy without it.
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
