RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (587) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: A Separate Thread for Gary Gaulin, As big as the poop that does not look< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Posts: 5042
Joined: Oct. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 01 2012,12:33   

Here is a good example I ran across in an Atheism forum, which helps show the educational problem. Notice how if they cannot understand a theory then the problem is not with them, its blamed on me as though its my fault they are way behind in science:

[]zeroone 1 point 1 year ago
Can someone try to make sense of this:_
[]bloodredsun 2 points 1 year ago
A big bag of crazy?
[]zeroone 1 point 1 year ago
Of course. But, ID arguments are usually at least somewhat coherent. Meaning, ID arguments usually involve invented/misinterpreted facts and logical fallacies. But, this is way beyond that. I can't understand a bit of it.

The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

  17594 replies since Oct. 31 2012,02:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (587) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   

Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]