sparc
Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 26 2012,22:56) | | Quote (Woodbine @ Nov. 26 2012,22:44) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 27 2012,04:33) | | And I sure cannot afford to fund my own research that was to redo all the incomplete/misleading experiments that have been published. |
To which incomplete or misleading experiments are you referring, Gary?
Instead of another 30 pages of rubbish why don't you select one of these published papers and explain why you think it's misleading and/or incomplete?
We'd love to see your expert analysis. |
Here's what I reference in the theory, because of being better than nothing:
S Ohno, Birth of a unique enzyme from an alternative reading frame of the preexisted, internally repetitious coding sequence., Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81:2421-2425, 1984.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/article....=345072
All you need is the title and maybe abstract of the paper so you can boast about how wonderful the theory you follow is, while I need to know the exact mechanism including any sensory systems that may be involved. |
You didn't explain the nylonase case yet.
BTW, are you aware that what you write is not really new? Did you never encounter James Shapiro?
--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."
- William Dembski -
|
