GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
| Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Nov. 03 2012,17:02) | | Quote | | For your plan to work as a counter-tactic you here have to in court show that the Intelligence Design Lab and its documentation is from religious scripture instead of from Heiserman, Trehub, and other researchers and research that is linked to from the theory. By the time the judge finishes reading it, they will be wondering how any sane person would even want to try stopping public schools from teaching science. |
It's already happened. You lot lost. Get over it already!
If/when it comes to court again, guess what. You'll lose again! And again! |
Oh, and the Dover, PA ruling by Judge Jones was only against the actions of their school board (that read a statement against another theory in classrooms and had creationism books in school library) not against the "Theory of Intelligent Design". As long as the teachers stick to the science that is in the theory it is legal to teach in any US public school district, including Dover's. Some states even enacted bills to protect teachers from being harassed for (within bounds of science) teaching it. Hence this makes sense: Jimmy Eat World - My Best Theory
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
