Joined: July 2006
|I here have to ask you, because the theory I write/represent has no such dichotomy. |
Perhaps if you answered the questions anyway, and explained why that is as you go along that would help.
|It's like me asking you whether your voltmeter can tell the difference between EMF and electricity. |
Except the difference is that we can go and learn about EMP and electricity from someone else other then you.
You are the only person who knows about your theory.
|Your next likely reaction would be to wonder what the heck motivated me ask a question like that.|
In fact my next reaction is to wonder why someone who is trying to sell their theory would not take a moment to address a sincere set of questions that are obviously designed to elicit something of relevance.
The fact that from your lofty viewpoint these questions are like asking whether your voltmeter can tell the difference between EMF and electricity is beside the point. It's your theory, so deign to descend and explain it even if it's in the context of a set of questions that make no sense when considered from the framework of your theory.
If you can't make the person asking the questions believe that those questions do not make sense if they understand then theory by explaining the theory to them in that context then you don't even have something that you understand yourself.
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
if there are even critical flaws in Gaugerís work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand