Joined: June 2007
|Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 26 2012,10:41)|
|I think of UD as the Wedge Document for any future Dover trial. There was a year or so after Dover (AD?) When UD tred to maintain the fiction that they were about science rather religion, but that is gone.|
The Adam and Eve fiasco was icing.
and you know that they won't de-tard. even gpuccio aint gonna de-tard.
and as a tardaholic i am happy to say that I am glad there will always be tards to lick.
but do you think that daily internetting them into hilarious logical contradictions, or goading them to deny empirical science solely on the basis of their magick beliefs, is providing a social benefit.
I don't think so, but in this thread I would like for people to provide examples of de-tarding. What we should want to do is to determine whether there is any correlation between de-tard and the strength and presentation of arguments offered against some form of creationism.
Because I don't think anyone is going to provide much of that. And I note that I am not denying that de-tard is possible, I am questioning specifically the notion that de-tard occurs as a consequence of the valiant deeds of these noble and courteous internetting white-knight defenders of science.
anyone have anything empirical? or hell, testimony? I can tell you how I de-tarded but it's the same old shit for you too probably. I think PZ's "why i am OP" shitkick is lamer than all hells and i never read his blag anyway but my prediction* is that if you compiled them all that the motiviation for those de-tards have very little to do with seriously considering internet arguments with tards
*where "prediction" = "speculation"
Edited by Erasmus, FCD on Sep. 26 2012,10:55
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK
Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG
the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat
I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles