Erasmus, FCD
Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007
|
The Salem Hypothesis isn't really a hypothesis but it is a pretty damn good predictor. If you want to go all meta- on a tard, particularly one that fits that bill, bring it up. Frilldo diddled himself with that one so long that carlson made it a key couplet
ETA to get back on topic, it seems that a corollary of the Salem 'hypothesis' might be that instances like the Coppedge fiasco might be scarce, relative to the evil athiest conspiracy squashing good creation science in university settings. Since, if it's true, engineers are more likely to be predisposed to being creationist it is much of a stretch to think that being a proselytizing creationist wanker ala Coppedge is more likely to escape disapproval in an engineering firm, as opposed to an academic department??
Edited by Erasmus, FCD on Mar. 13 2012,18:48
--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK
Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG
the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat
I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles
|
