Erasmus, FCD
Posts: 6349 Joined: June 2007
|
Quote (forastero @ Dec. 10 2011,11:08) | Quote (Lou FCD @ Dec. 09 2011,07:14) | Quote (forastero @ Dec. 09 2011,06:58) | The Lord is good and he surely kept aquatic refuges |
Really??? Where is *that* in the Bible?
I find it amazing that you have to postulate aquatic refuges because while your good god was committing global genocide, he took time to save the fish.
Quote (forastero @ Dec. 09 2011,06:58) | Btw, I have already provided secular references to worldwide flooding |
Oh really? I missed those. Can you provide a link, please? This I gotta see.
Also, what is the point here, Tardbucket?
You're going to great lengths to try to use science (you're failing miserably, by the way) to support the authenticity of the Bible, but at every turn you come to something that contradicts everything we know about the universe and you must resort to "it must have been yet another miracle".
Why bother? Why not just start with the miracle and call it day?
Of course the simpler solution is that the Bible isn't actually true, but we all know you cannot possibly go there.
So again, what's the point here? |
Again, it was Satan and man had already pretty much destroyed the earth and they will again. The Hebrew word renes makes it clear that aquatic animals need not be brought upon the ark
Biologists recognize various marine refugia during a huge extinction event and have you ever seen all of the vast mountain ranges, valleys, caves, freshwater sinks, hydothermal vents, and even what appear to be beaches and oceans within oceans—made up of heavier waters within huge depressions? |
awwww it had a feel do you like that feel fourass
-------------- You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK
Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG
the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat
I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles
|