RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (51) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: forastero's thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Tracy P. Hamilton



Posts: 1239
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 04 2011,19:52   

Quote (JohnW @ Dec. 04 2011,19:25)
There's no evidence that either can produce the effects you want , but let's suppose you can pin your hopes on cosmic rays and/or distance to the Sun affecting decay rates in the way you'd like:

How much life would survive if the cosmic-ray flux at the Earth's surface was 100,000 times higher?

How much life would survive if the Earth was 100,000 times, or even 100 times, closer to the sun?

Why did the radioisotope power plants on the Galileo and Cassini probes work as expected?

I wonder if the nitwit knows that a manned mission to Mars is not feasible because the cosmic rays in space are extremely likely to cause cancer, down here not so much.

--------------
"Following what I just wrote about fitness, you’re taking refuge in what we see in the world."  PaV

"The simple equation F = MA leads to the concept of four-dimensional space." GilDodgen

"We have no brain, I don't, for thinking." Robert Byers

  
  1510 replies since Oct. 21 2011,05:55 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (51) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]