OgreMkV
Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009
|
| Quote (forastero @ Nov. 16 2011,23:27) | | Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 16 2011,08:31) | | Quote (forastero @ Nov. 15 2011,15:19) | The same the Flood piled up over 2200 feet in Carboniferous Texas
THE MISSISSIPPIAN BARNETT FORMATION:
A SOURCE-ROCK, SEAL, AND RESERVOIR PRODUCED BY EARLY CARBONIFEROUS FLOODING OF THE TEXAS CRATON
http://www.beg.utexas.edu/resprog....ter.pdf |
So, 2200 = 17,000?
So, are you claiming here that the strata that is the flood is from the carboniferous?
So, we should start looking for 17,000 feet worth of coal somewhere in the carboniferous period?
While, we're talking, please discuss the Green River Formation and the annual layers that result in 6 million years of history in that one formation.
I'd like to know if that is a pre-flood, flood, or post-flood strata.
Thanks |
Again, are you ever gonna tell me where this 17,000 ft of sediment was found?
Again, the carboniferous represents strata of hydrocarbonated fossil fuels caused by Flooded and buried rainforests.
Likewise, the Green River formation is a remnant of the great the Niobrara Sea, which is itself a remnant of the Flood |
READ what we Fucking write dude. Jesus you're dumb.
I've mentioned it twice and given you the link to it.
Interesting, so if the Green River formation occurred during the year of the flood, then please do explain (including citations of experimental evidence) of how 42 layers of siltstone appeared EVERY SINGLE DAY, while in a raging flood.
It might interest you to know that the Green River Formation is EOCENE in age... which is a couple hundred million years AFTER the Carboniferous.
So, which is the flood strata again, carboniferous, really? That's your claim? Are you sure? Is that your final answer?
yes/no
--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.
http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat
|
