forastero
Posts: 458
Joined: Oct. 2011
|
| Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 13 2011,17:04) | | Quote (forastero @ Nov. 13 2011,12:51) | | Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 13 2011,12:39) | | Quote (forastero @ Nov. 13 2011,11:17) | | Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 13 2011,07:39) | | Quote me, liar. |
And then a few days later you flipflopped right back to your original assertion for a three count |
See forastero, you are not in a debate. This is a forum. It is a place where every comment is permanently placed in a location you can't edit it. The same, of course, goes for us.
You made a claim. Back it up with evidence (for once in your life). Provide the quote or retract your claim.
BTW: What exactly exploded to cause the Big Bang? And where in the geologic column should we look for the world-wide flood layer?
These questions are consequences of your claims. You cannot support them.
I conclude that you are pretty much worthless as comes to research. |
Good try but all the evolution guys edit doodoo like flies so your just sewing more lies |
Sorry to burst your bubble forastero
But you see this:
| Quote | | Edited by Wesley R. Elsberry on Nov. 13 2011,09:31 |
This statement will appear on any post edited. So, IF the post where I claimed to already know about something was edited, then you would be able to tell.
But whatever.
It still doesn't change the fact that you don't have a clue. |
Nov. 07 2011,10:14 For example, the decay rate of radioactive materials and the speed of light. The energy released in H-H fusion. None of these things have changed over the observed history of the universe (some 13 billion years or so).
Nov. 07 2011,14:33 My research shows that the decay rate varies based on the sun. The rotation of the solar core AND the distance from the Earth to the sun.
Nov. 08 2011,12:10 “We aren't dismissing the gravity (ahem) of the fluctuations. We're dismissing your claim that they exist.”
See, Scientific flipflopping
|
