forastero
Posts: 458
Joined: Oct. 2011
|
| Quote (MichaelJ @ Nov. 12 2011,21:03) | Wow the word salad really comes out when they lose the argument doesn't it.
"Again, the fluctuations, assumptions, circular calibrations, contaminations, religious fervor, etc etc etc make your radiomagic dating a joke."
He has stated this and except for a 0.5% possible issue with fluctuations he has failed to show any other issues with dating.
"Again, No because its only a "part" of the reason that your dating is way off"
So why the feck lead with the issue that only results in a 0.5% error. This is like the Mt St Helens thing - He has these magical super-secret proofs, but he trots out the tired old creationist carnards. |
Actually I already went over that stuff but y'all only want to discuss this new finding on fluctuating decay rates
|
