forastero
Posts: 458
Joined: Oct. 2011
|
| Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Nov. 12 2011,20:28) | | Quote (forastero @ Nov. 12 2011,21:19) | | Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Nov. 12 2011,19:32) | | Quote (forastero @ Nov. 12 2011,20:21) | | Right, it should make it appear older imo |
Again, the fluctuations, assumptions, circular calibrations, contaminations, religious fervor, etc etc etc make your radiomagic dating a joke. |
|
I'm not asking whether it is your belief that radiometric dating is a joke, or whether you otherwise disdain that and other techniques that indicate an earth that as vastly older than your wishful fiction.
I am asking if it is your belief that the errors alleged in your cites are sufficient to result in ages that are not merely older, but 227,000 times older.
Is that your belief??
While you are at it, give us a clue regarding why you are reluctant to respond, Forastero the Kong (FTK?) |
Again, No because its only a "part" of the reason that your dating is way off.
Btw, being obtuse is just another hand waving excuse to not put up your intellectual dukes
|
