forastero
Posts: 458
Joined: Oct. 2011
|
| Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 07 2011,10:14) | | Quote (forastero @ Nov. 07 2011,09:39) | | Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 07 2011,07:58) | OK, he's lost it.
No content that even makes sense.
The ENTIRE point of YOUR discussion of changes in solar energy and vegetative loss of minerals and changes in bone density was that fundamental laws of physics were changing and that is why radiometric dating isn't valid.
At least I think that's what it was. You've been really hard to follow. You constantly conflate things that we have said with topics we're not discussing. Your writing has gotten steadily worse over time.
If you still want to talk, why don't you pick ONE topic, and we'll skip all the rest for later.
Why don't you remind us, what actually exploded to cause the Big bang? |
You said that forces have not changed over time and I showed you that they have. And as I said before, it wasnt just to challenge radiometric dating but your insistence on uniformitarianism. Oh and that bones show devolution.
Again has your body had the same force throughout its lifetime? Have the forces working on the grand canyon always been of the same strength? No, of course not. For instance, your own priests admit that the tectonic and water forces were much stronger during the "Grand Canyon event". Moreover, the earth's internal heat has decreased over time as has hydrologic cycles.
Actually it was you who has gone off on so many tangents with your bureaucratic lists of requests and definitions.
People who think science has really explained the earth's origins have often made science their religion and usually one that is pseudoempirically more silly than even Pan's pantheism
Maybe you no like how teacher write but when grasshopper fight with spite, teacher treat him like fly |
I have insisted on uniformantarianism only for those things with have been shown, over the observed history of the universe to NOT CHANGE.
For example, the decay rate of radioactive materials and the speed of light. The energy released in H-H fusion. None of these things have changed over the observed history of the universe (some 13 billion years or so).
The things you mentioned (as I've said at least four times now) are all things that do change within the known laws of the universe and they do not imply or indicate that the known laws and constants of the universe are changing... which is what you must have in order to argue against the radiometric dating... which was your entire purpose.
All of the diversions and distractions are due to responses to your comments.
Sorry, dude, play concern troll all you want, but when you don't know the difference between a shark and a dinosaur, then it becomes necessary to ask for clarification.
I'm sorry if it offends you that we ask for clarification... not that you ever provide it anyway.
Tell us, forastero, what is your explanation for the origin of the Earth.
And remind me, what exactly, exploded to cause the Big Bang.
Yes, you are being very spiteful and as your teacher, we are annoyed by it. You are being treated like a fly... actually a chew toy. This is fun for most of us. I really hope you didn't think any of us were taking you seriously.
You see, you can argue, complain, whine, cry, argue, yell, conflate, obfuscate, confuse, etc. all you want. It doesn't change the simple fact that science works. They work for companies that are using the principles you claim are false to make money. They work for physicians who use the principles you claim are false to save lives. They work for millions (maybe even billions) of people every single day.
You can complain about it all you want. But these principles simply work. You will never be able to convince someone who has made billions of dollars and saved thousands of lives that the science they are using is wrong. Because, it's not.
I'm sorry that you are confused. I'm sorry that you will not learn what real science is. And I'm sorry that you live in a fantasy world. We can't help unless you want to be helped and it's pretty obvious you don't want to.
But, please continue to fling your poo. Who knows something might stick... besides, I learn things from it... perhaps not what you think I should learn, but I still learn. |
Please tell me again how y'all observed these 13 billion years of geology and what is this concern/cry troll card that you keep playing?
|
