forastero
Posts: 458
Joined: Oct. 2011
|
| Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 05 2011,13:17) | | Quote (forastero @ Nov. 05 2011,12:41) | If if the systems degrade [due to sin] as you say, it doesnt diminish the fact that thing or way different today. Plus you even admit that the forces makes huge leaps and drops.
Oh and again, what are you empirically calibrating this dating technique to and why must they autonomously send the samples all over to "supposedly" prevent the abundantly prevalent fraud with these dating techniques? A few secret emails is the norm, I'm sure.
Again go look at a geological map like the dudes do and you will see that these so called eras are spread all over horizontally. Plus oil dudes often love anything that supports survival of the fittest corporate cronyism. |
1) quote me, in context, as saying that forces make huge leaps and drops. Explain how my comment (as referenced above) implies in any way, shape, or form that fundamental laws are changing. (Hint, the force applied to a car when you lightly touch the gas pedal is much lower than when you press the pedal all the way to the floor.)
2) isochrons - look it up
You still have not explained what the mechanism of the change in fundamental forces is that would cause radioactivity to change rates. You still have not explained how this change continues to result in wildly different dating methods all returning the same age.
3) Have you ever heard of 'uplift' or 'sinking'.
You are actually incorrect, oil dudes love anything that makes them money and geology does so. What contributions have your notions made to the world? None... |
Just look at your quote on the radical gradients of solar forces
I'm the one that brought up uplift. Its why your geologic column myth is a joke
And I'm still waiting on how you calibrate your dating technique
|
