OgreMkV
Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009
|
| Quote (forastero @ Nov. 05 2011,03:10) | Actually, you had had looked into some billions of years-old crystal ball chronologies when I said:
Its pseudoempericism to say that no kinds of radiometric contamination are alterations occurred in billions or even thousands of years is as ridiculous as saying dinosaur soft tissue can last millions of years. Plus, please tell me how this type of radiometric dating
Then you insisted that no fundamental forces in our universe have changed over time and I countered with:
-Uniformitarianism is pseudoscience because in reality our sun is dying, the earths rotational spin is slowing, Lunar rotations are dissipating, ocean currents are slowing, the earth's internal heat is cooling, tectonics is slowing, star migration is slowing, the magnetic field is weakening, the hydrologic cycle is drying up, oceanic tides are weakening, fruits and vegetables of today have lost large percentages of their mineral content over the last 50 years, bones are becoming less dense, etc.......
I gave you many quotes from top scientists who claimed "explosion" including from your own links. Plus the priest that developed the Big Bang theory said it was an explosion and Einstein concurred that the priest was right.
Again for the fifth time, try googling Cambrian and benthic
What geologic columns? You can find stratigraphic relatively in recent terms but uplifting destroys, mixes and or contaminates very ancient stratigraphy. Even Cenozoic sites are a jumbled hodgepodge dated by preconceived ideas. Even De Vince knew that. Just look at a geological map. Its a mosaic spread out horizontally in all kinds of crazy looking mosaics based on index fossils, which were supposedly originally dated by depth. This is circular reasoning. Plus, we are finding living index fossils all the time |
Oh yeah here we go again. Do you read what we write?
1) look up isochrons, explain in detail why all isochron dating methods are wrong and yet they still all converge on the same date.
2) The sun is 'dying' by known physical, chemical, and nuclear processes that are consistent with known processes. In fact, it is also known that these processes are exactly the same as they were about 13 billion years ago... because we can see these processes in action 13 billion years ago.
3) Earth's rotation and Lunar rotations are caused by the exact same thing, a transfer of energy from the Earth to the Moon, causing the Earth to slow and the Moon to speed up, moving away from us. This is simple, very simple, physics. It is a known, explained process that does not mean fundamental laws are changing.
4) currents change all the time. Major currents also change, just more slowly. This is a known and explained process that does not indicate fundamental laws are changing.
5) Earth's internal heat is based on radiation. When the process or radioactive decay occurs (a known process that does not indicate fundamental laws are changing) that means there is less material to warm the interior of the Earth.
I could go on, but there is no point.
You, forastero, are confusing the fundamental laws of nature, with the natural process of entropy as energy flows are used to create work and some of that energy is lost to non-productive heat.
There is nothing in this list that implies or indicates in any way that a fundamental law, force, or character is changing.
I have previously asked you for evidence for the latter three of these claims and you did not provide any.
Quotes!?!?!? Who cares? An explosion is a simple explanation for people who can't understand expansion. I'll ask you again... what exploded? Since even sub-atomic particles and matter/anti-matter didn't exist until AFTER the big bang... what exploded?
The Cambrian was an era. The benthic fossils that you are concerned with were FOUND in a variety of rocks that are Cambrian in age (i.e. 530 mya and 580 mya). The reason, of course, that all the life was benthic is because a) There were no land dwelling species at the time and b) the formations that caused the majority of the fossillization were underwater landslides on continental shelves and canyons.
I don't understand why you can't understand this.
No, they are not. The geologic column was developed and used for construction purposes well before Darwin was born. In fact, the early (Christian) geologists could look at the fossils in a rock column and tell you what kind of rock it was and what kind of rock was above it and below it.
Interestingly, your claim here makes a mockery of entire fields of industry that are making billions of dollars per year (oil, diamonds, coal, etc). So, since they are making money (lots of money) off what you claim to be inaccurate, I think that pretty much trumps your claims.
No, we do not find living index fossils all the time. That's why they are index fossils because they lived for a very specific amount of time and then no more were ever found. Like I said, oil geologists use index fossils daily. It works.
--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.
http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat
|
