forastero
Posts: 458
Joined: Oct. 2011
|
| Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Oct. 25 2011,06:13) | | Quote (forastero @ Oct. 25 2011,06:07) | | Again, as soon as one of ya explain to me whats currently accepted |
Sigh. Perhaps you should read this:
http://www.amazon.com/Greates....&sr=1-4
So, here's what is currently accepted: The origin of species that we observe around us has no telic input whatsoever. Unguided evolution is the origin of biological diversity.
A specific example: Yanoconodon allini shows a transition between modern mammals and their distant ancestors which illustrates a transitional structure in the long process of evolution of mammal ears.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article....-action
Evolution explains the origin of mammalian ears via a series of such data points.
How does ID explain the origin of mammalian ears? |
Migrating jaws and ears is just more silly conjectures; and again, so called homologies in no way prove evolution or dismiss intelligent design. In fact, a loving creator not only wants to give all life a fair shake but also to live in ecological balance and harmony. Homologies also instill empathy with man.
Plus, this incessant referral to everything found during the so called age of reptiles as reptilian is just one more of the myriad ways that evolutionism retards science. The myriad mammal-like reptiles are actually mammals, many of which can still be found living today. Come to think of it, I bet most Cambrian critters can still be found living today.
Oh and while we’re on the subjects of giant mammalian sea critters, some dolphins were bigger and badder than even megalodon (giant great white)
P.S. sorry but please ignore the second half of my above response to you for that was actually meant for a different member
|
