oldmanintheskydidntdoit
Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006
|
| Quote (forastero @ Oct. 25 2011,06:07) | | Again, as soon as one of ya explain to me whats currently accepted |
Sigh. Perhaps you should read this:
http://www.amazon.com/Greates....&sr=1-4
So, here's what is currently accepted: The origin of species that we observe around us has no telic input whatsoever. Unguided evolution is the origin of biological diversity.
A specific example: Yanoconodon allini shows a transition between modern mammals and their distant ancestors which illustrates a transitional structure in the long process of evolution of mammal ears.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article....-action
Evolution explains the origin of mammalian ears via a series of such data points.
How does ID explain the origin of mammalian ears?
--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings
|
