Glen Davidson
Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006
|
| Quote (Kattarina98 @ Sep. 30 2013,17:21) | The thread about evolution of h.s.s. is quite interesting: vjtorley supports Common Descent with good arguments, bolstered by interesting links, and Mung concurs and ridicules the YECS.
Niwrad outs himself as the author of the OP, and then he brings the best argument evah to disprove Common Descent:
| Quote | | Not at all. I deny CD from a pure engineering point of view. No engineer on earth would make systems transforming themselves when they are working, because it is an engineering suicide. Imagine to transform a car engine into a gas turbine while it is running? If this is an impossibility for an engine, go figure transforming living beings during their life, which are far more complex and fragile systems. |
Please don't diss the engineers. :p
ETA: My bolding |
Creationists can never quite figure out that it's not the organism that evolves, can they?
I guess they were never told are incapable of learning.
Glen Davidson
--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p
Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy
|
