CeilingCat
Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007
|
| Quote (Richardthughes @ Aug. 01 2013,23:28) | | Quote (sparc @ Aug. 01 2013,22:16) | Now that must have hurt: | Quote | “Intelligent design is overwhelmingly deemed by the scientific community as a religious belief and not a scientific theory,” President Jo Ann Gora said. “Therefore, intelligent design is not appropriate content for science courses. The gravity of this issue and the level of concern among scientists are demonstrated by more than 80 national and state scientific societies' independent statements that intelligent design and creation science do not qualify as science.”
The question is not one of academic freedom, but one of academic integrity, she added. “Said simply, to allow intelligent design to be presented to science students as a valid scientific theory would violate the academic integrity of the course as it would fail to accurately represent the consensus of science scholars.” |
Indeed it did. |
Bonus: Robert Byers' sexist rant! |
Color me perverse, but I'd love to see a book by Robert Byers. To hell with amateurs like William J. Murray. I want the Real Tard, the kind of tard that floats in free space, with bits of it totally unencumbered by any connection to reality. Tard so thin you can drink it through a straw and so thick you can eat it with chopsticks. Tard that will start a new religion, The One True Religion.
Write a book, Bobby, I'll pay cash money to read it!
|
