Leftfield
Posts: 107 Joined: Nov. 2006
|
nightlight has been offering a new brand of bafflegab. WJM assures us nightlight is in the big tent:
Quote | I don’t really see how any of what you are saying is threatening in any way to any other ID position. It seems to me you are offering the same kind of description of the way intelligence computes and generates ID phenomena as Newton offered in his mathematical description of gravity.
It is a model for describing the mechanism of intelligent ordering towards design – nothing more, really. It doesn’t claim – or even imply – that god doesn’t exist or that humans do not have autonomous free will (which, IMO, is a commodity distinct from intelligence anyway). |
So, as long as your ID position doesn't claim, or even imply, that god doesn't exist, your position does not threaten any other ID position, and (presumably) you are welcome at UD.
All Science So Far.
[edited to remove non-working link to comment 134 in UD thread titled "Optimus, replying to KN on ID . . . ".]
-------------- Speaking for myself, I have long been confused . . .-Denyse O'Leary
|