RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 18 2013,11:01   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Mar. 18 2013,10:19)
There's really only one "scientific" argument against evolution, and that's Behe's. It has the unfortunate attributes of being testable and having eroded over time.

KF's isolated islands is a variation on Behe.

Once you demonstrate that the water is only ankle deep, that argument collapses.

Still, since evolutionary theory according to known mechanisms entails the production of irreducible complexity, while IDiocy doesn't entail it at all (or really anything, as normally presented), it was never much of an anti-evolution argument.  

It may have eroded further, but it was junk to begin with.

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]