RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Ptaylor



Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 14 2013,23:22   

Quote (Patrick @ Mar. 11 2013,14:22)
     
Quote (CeilingCat @ Mar. 10 2013,18:16)
Whatever happened to Gil Dodgen?  He hasn't been on UD since July 7th of last year.

         
Quote (REC @ Mar. 10 2013,19:12)
Sal Cordova, Jonathan M(cLatchie), and Johnny B(artlett) also seem absent.

We're in the KF era now. I'm just waiting for Joe to get original post privileges.

You two strike me as the type who ignore the warnings of all the natives, break into the heavily protected ancient tomb, and read the inscriptions on the walls out loud.

Then you're surprised when the sarcophagi start to open....

...and as foretold, behold! - the return of the living braindead :
     
Quote
26 GilDodgen March 14, 2013 at 9:02 pm

EM: Religious belief is an evolutionary adaption.

Gil: Which random mutations would be required to rewire a primitive simian brain for religious belief? What is the probability that they would occur and be fixed in the population, given the available probabilistic resources?

EM: Say what?

Gil: EM, “Junk science” is a term that is insufficient to describe your proposition. Making up stories based on a conclusion that was reached in advance is the antithesis of legitimate scientific investigation.

Barry,

It is with perhaps some, but very little, apology for my transparent cynicism, that I ask: How can an educated, intelligent, rational person still accept this Darwinian drivel, given the ubiquitous availability of information showing it to be irrational, self-contradictory, mathematically absurd, and consistently falsified both empirically and by everyday experience?

I was, as no other, indoctrinated by this Darwinian nonsense for 43 years, but quickly figured it out, once presented with logic and evidence — the two great enemies of Darwinism.


It's argument E1 - bwahahaha!
UD link

Edit: added a word to add to the dramatical effect

Edited by Ptaylor on Mar. 15 2013,20:15

--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]