stevestory
Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote |
Robert ByersNovember 1, 2012 at 1:47 pm
Kantian Naturalist.
You say the “coercive nature of the state” means the state can’t allow creationism.
If its coercive then its doing so in saying Genesis is false in its conclusions by teaching evolution etc and by banning creationism in a subject that is abiut teaching the TRUTH on origins.
The state has a religious opinion by banning religious opinion in absolute truths being taught.
How not so?
If the state says creationism(s) are religious ideas about origins then banning them on subjects dealing with origins is a state opinion that the religious opinions are FALSE.
Thats logic and law.
Creationism just needs more good lawyers and cases to work with I say.
Censorship in a free nation is absurd.
In America its traitorous.
They are using the state to attack Christianity by their own lines of reasoning.
They are also obstructing the search for truth on mutual heritage of mankind.
its that damn important to them.
So be it!
|
By that reasoning, the state can't provide medical care to students, since that's taking a position contrary to certain religious beliefs. Or teach...well...virtually anything.
What a dumbass. This guy is distinctly dumber than the avg UDer, which is something.
Edited by stevestory on Nov. 01 2012,16:00
|
