GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
| Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 30 2012,21:45) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ Oct. 30 2012,20:59) | | Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 30 2012,20:40) | Gary, I saw this in a conversation you had online:
| Quote |
Control Of Krebs Cycle By Molecular Intelligence
In living things molecular intelligence is seen controlling what self-assembles from the powerful Krebs Cycle that has become the core metabolic cycle of cells. It is the power plant and factory where a dozen or so catalytic molecules (protein, mineral or other) are drawn to metabolic pathway assembly lines that makes a copy of the molecule it started with every time around the circle. It does this by adding a non-chiral (structurally identical) mirror image of the starting molecule then when the cycle is completed it breaks in half resulting in two identical copies.
At any stage through the assembly cycle a molecule of proper fit may be drawn by molecular forces into a nearby self-assembly interaction to where it fits. At least part of the Reverse Krebs Cycle is catalyzed by volcanic clay/dust/mineral in sunlight making it possible that the cycle was once common planetary chemistry.[11][12]
Where there is no molecular intelligence present the Krebs Cycle would not be able to produce cells and exist regardless of molecular intelligence being present or not to control it. A rudimentary intelligence may actually be challenged to keep up with its production rate but not necessarily be destroyed by periods of overproduction.
Intelligence to exploit this cycle could easily form in its local environment. Once active it would have little problem controlling this existing metabolism. We can here predict self-assembly of a precellular starter mechanism that produces a genome from scratch, instead of a genome first being required to produce this intelligence.
|
Elsewhere, you've said that you are revising your text constantly. Is this the latest stable text that you have about the citric acid cycle? |
Due to the extreme amount of work putting this theory together (and its politics) I only have time and resources for what most matters to science. Here's my latest project:
http://www.biology-online.org/biology....p146133 |
That doesn't have anything to do with the citric acid cycle.
So let's put it another way: Is your statement that I quoted above about the citric acid cycle something that you feel is defensible? Or are you saying that it isn't, but you've been too busy to retract it? |
There is some older material to elaborate on that here:
https://sites.google.com/site.......ull.doc
And I can add a paper under construction that might be helpful, for summing other things up:
https://sites.google.com/site.......fID.pdf
But I don’t see anything inherently wrong with what you quoted (other than not going into as much detail as is possible):
| Quote | Citric acid cycle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......d_cycle
The citric acid cycle — also known as the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle), the Krebs cycle, or the Szent-Györgyi–Krebs cycle[1][2] — is a…. |
If you can show that it is wrong, then I would first have to blame it on Wikipedia, before agreeing that you are right. :D
From my experience though, they are used interchangeably, even though where I have to look for differences can say that the chemistry varies in a way that the forward/reverse TCA of origin of life papers is a more simple way of achieving the present day Citric Acid Cycle and Krebs. They are otherwise the same to me. But since what you are describing is more of a details thing that’s maybe more a mission for you to improve the wording of.
Getting sidetracked on the Chromosome Illustrator project was the result of the paper also needing to better explain how “addressing” (as explained at Biology-Online) works, to make a molecular intelligence model relatively easy to program. It’s one of the things that I do have to focus my attention on, because of it being needed by all experimenting with the computer model and theory. But if you find a more precise way to word things then that will become the new priority and I will in minutes make the change so I can get back to work on what makes this theory unique, and scientifically valuable.
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
