Quack
Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007
|
| Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Oct. 30 2012,10:17) | | Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Oct. 29 2012,14:58) | | Quote | MungOctober 29, 2012 at 8:56 am
The science isn’t producing the results they had hoped, so now they attack the religion (as long as it isn’t Islam).
|
 |
I don't read ID but when I do I want to read spluttering and playa hatin on an interview with richard dawkins in playboy that Gordon just *happened* to stumble upon while searching for child porn
OK Which one of you is this fucker
| Quote |
8
Kantian NaturalistOctober 29, 2012 at 4:12 pm
Dawkins is pretty much the worst poster-child for metaphysical naturalism, ever — he’s smug, condescending, and inconsistent. (Not that anyone here would disagree with me — I just wanted to say that to make clear that he doesn’t represent my version of metaphysical naturalism.)
|
| Quote |
9
Robert ByersOctober 29, 2012 at 4:54 pm
What’s his opinion on the centrefold chick?
Playboy and company should be censored as they are porn.
It’s a immoral enemy of Christianity , manhood, and America.
Knpw’s more then fundamentalists about the bible etc??
Nope. |
Awwwww booby can science potato
Tell me you don't feel like an asshole for just reading Booby's posts. There is no way that you can read what that blithering idiot types and not be empirically stupider
this shit will rot your brain boys and girls |
If he thinks Playboy is porn he ain't seen nothing like what I've seen yet...
He's the one that if justice would prevail should be censored. But we are magnanimous and love our enemies! As The man said, they don't know what they are doing.
--------------
Rocks have no biology.
Robert Byers.
|
