RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 26 2012,23:03   

From #6:

Quote
What is specified complexity? Give two examples. How does it provide a reliable method for
detecting design? ...


Uh, yeah, how?  Presuppositionalism?  Actually, judging by the rot Dembski teaches, presuppositionalism would seem to be it, although I suspect that he'd never admit it.

I guess what I wanted to say is that, however absurd the questions, I'm having trouble imagining acceptable answers.  Just the same tripe that appears at UD, or are they at least pretending to do something less stupid?

If only we had some of the "outstanding responses" that Dembski elicited...  Probably more depressing than humorous, though.

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]